UK Liberty


Posted in law and order by ukliberty on November 3, 2009

A timely article from Auntie:

The sacked drugs adviser Prof David Nutt famously compared its risks with those of ecstasy. But just how dangerous is horse riding? …

In his paper earlier this year, Prof Nutt noted that riding in the UK was associated with 10 deaths and 100 traffic accidents a year. He coined the tongue-in-cheek “equine addiction syndrome” or “equasy” when suggesting it might be more harmful than ecstasy.

Dr John Silver, emeritus spinal injuries consultant, researched serious injuries in professional rugby union, gymnastics and trampolining, and horse riding, over a period of many years. …

In his paper Hazards of Horse-riding as a Popular Sport [abstract here], Dr Silver cited a study from 1985 that suggested motorcyclists suffered a serious accident once every 7,000 hours but a horse rider could expect a serious incident once in every 350 hours.

Now, I wouldn’t have expected the difference to be that much (but then I had no idea of the risks of either activity).

Dr Silver also cites a figure from 1992 of 12 equestrian-related fatalities from 2.87 million participants. …

More dangerous on the face of it than cannabis but less dangerous than alcohol and ecstasy.

It is not easy to gain a complete overview about the dangers of horse riding.  The British Horse Society says there are no centrally collated figures on horse riding injuries. There is no obligation to notify the society about any incident. …

Of course not – why would we want people to be informed of the risks of an activity we approve of / don’t feel inclined to interfere with?

And of course, to fans of the sport, many of whom regard it as as much of a way of life as it is a mere hobby, any recognition of the dangers must be tempered by the positives of the sport. …

Absolutely a reasonable point and I imagine it applies to any sport.  I suspect there are no benefits in taking Ecstasy… but one never knows. Well, facetious comments aside, some drugs (legal and illegal) are said to be of benefit in particular circumstances.

Mark Weston, director of Access, Safety and Welfare said: “The health benefits of horse riding are well known, how anyone can maintain that taking a class A drug has such benefits beggars belief.”

Um, no-one has claimed that taking a class A drug has such benefits as associated with horse-riding – the point was about the risks associated with each activity.  And really the decision should be ours after we weigh up the benefits and costs, not the government’s.

But none of this addresses the fundamental issue relating to interference with your freedom to do as you please so long as you do not harm others – you know, that ‘society’ asserts the right to interfere with you For Your Own Good.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: