UK Liberty

Freedom of speech is alive and well I see

Posted in freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, law and order by ukliberty on May 21, 2008

The Telegraph:

A teenage boy is facing a possible criminal prosecution for holding a sign describing the Church of Scientology as a “cult”, police said on Tuesday.

The boy, who is described only as a minor, was taking part in a demonstration outside the church’s central London headquarters on May 10 when City of London Police officers ordered him to remove the placard.

It read: “Scientology is not a religion, it is a dangerous cult.”

When he refused,

Apparently quoting Judge Latey: “Scientology is both immoral and socially obnoxious…It is corrupt sinister and dangerous. It is corrupt because it is based on lies and deceit and has its real objective money and power for Mr. Hubbard… It is sinister because it indulges in infamous practices both to its adherents who do not toe the line unquestioningly and to those who criticize it or oppose it. It is dangerous because it is out to capture people and to indoctrinate and brainwash them so they become the unquestioning captives and tools of the cult, withdrawn from ordinary thought, living, and relationships with others.”

he was issued with a form of summons for an alleged breach of public order. Police plan to pass a file to the Crown Prosecution Service to decide whether charges can be brought. …

Chief Supt Rob Bastable said: “City of London Police upholds the right to demonstrate lawfully, but we have to balance that with the right of all sections of community not to be alarmed, harassed or distressed as a result of other people’s behaviour.”

  1. Did anyone make a complaint?
  2. Is their faith so fragile that they would be “alarmed, harassed or distressed”?
  3. Are some City of London police involved with Scientology?
  4. What training do the police receive, if any, in “balancing” the freedoms of speech, expression and assembly against “the right not to be alarmed, harassed, or distressed”?
  5. Will anyone refer the police/CPS to the reply given in Arkell vs. Pressdram?

The “alleged breach of public order”, by the way, refers to s5 of the Public Order Act 1986 (a pity it isn’t 1984, so much more poetic):

5. Harassment, alarm or distress.
— (1) A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(3) It is a defence for the accused to prove—
(a) that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or
(b) that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or
(c) that his conduct was reasonable.

(6) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

Currently a level 3 fine is up to £1000.

Perhaps the protestors should wear clothing and brandish placards that read, “we are threated, abused and insulted by any writing, sign or other visible representation of Scientology or the City of London police and are likely to be harassed, alarmed or distressed by it.”

Then the law, Scientologists and City of London police can disappear up their own collective arse.

Again I feel the need to quote Natan Sharansky’s Town Square Test:

If a person cannot walk into the middle of the town square and express his or her views without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or physical harm, then that person is living in a fear society, not a free society. We cannot rest until every person living in a “fear society” has finally won their freedom.

Advertisements

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. ian said, on May 21, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    I like the Town Square test, which I have never seen before. Excellent. As for the police defending nutters like Scientology from distress…

  2. dearieme said, on May 22, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    Fuck the Pope. If I may say so. And the
    Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland.

  3. […] surveillance challenge part II « UK Liberty on Protest surveillance challengedearieme on Freedom of speech is alive and well I seeian on Freedom of speech is alive and well […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: