<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for UK Liberty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A blog on issues relating to liberty in the UK. "I take the view that it is part of being a good citizen, proving who you are, day in day out" - Andy Burnham, Home Office Minister. "Unfortunately we were unable to maintain the legislation which we wanted to do which would give us the power to detain people [without trial].” - Tony Blair, Prime Minister. "we should see an identity card, like a passport, in country, if you like" - Meg Hillier, Home Office Minister.  "People who hope to be due for re-election in two years’ time are not the best people to trust with the liberty of the individual." Alistair Carmichael MP</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Voting report by ukliberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/voting-report/#comment-9806</link>
		<dc:creator>ukliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=652#comment-9806</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, thank you.

&lt;a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/04/supreme-court-allows-indiana-voter.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here is some more info&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, thank you.</p>
<p><a href="http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/04/supreme-court-allows-indiana-voter.php" rel="nofollow">Here is some more info</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voting report by David</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/voting-report/#comment-9805</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=652#comment-9805</guid>
		<description>By way of comparison:

"The Supreme Court, voting 6-3, on Monday rejected a constitutional challenge to Indiana’s law requiring voters to show a government-issued photo ID before they may cast a ballot."

Cheers,

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By way of comparison:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Supreme Court, voting 6-3, on Monday rejected a constitutional challenge to Indiana’s law requiring voters to show a government-issued photo ID before they may cast a ballot.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First impulse is to spy on people by Voting report &#171; UK Liberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/first-impulse-is-to-spy-on-people/#comment-9797</link>
		<dc:creator>Voting report &#171; UK Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=638#comment-9797</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments UK Liberty on First impulse is to spy on&#160;peopleukliberty on Cost of ID&#160;cardsCayce Pollard on Cost of ID&#160;cardsViolent Offender Order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments UK Liberty on First impulse is to spy on&nbsp;peopleukliberty on Cost of ID&nbsp;cardsCayce Pollard on Cost of ID&nbsp;cardsViolent Offender Order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First impulse is to spy on people by UK Liberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/first-impulse-is-to-spy-on-people/#comment-9796</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=638#comment-9796</guid>
		<description>[...] course!  Anything can be solved by a database. Currently only heads of households have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course!  Anything can be solved by a database. Currently only heads of households have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cost of ID cards by ukliberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/cost-of-id-cards/#comment-9787</link>
		<dc:creator>ukliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=641#comment-9787</guid>
		<description>But Jacqui Smith didn't say that benefit claimants will be asked to verify their identity against the Register - &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7281368.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;she implied it, she didn't say it&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Would Jean Hutchinson have been able to commit her crimes if she had been asked to give a photo and fingerprint as proof of her identity when she registered each new benefit claim? The answer is no.

A simple check against the National Identity Register would have revealed the real person's face and fingerprints.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://digitaldebateblogs.typepad.com/digital_identity/2008/03/id-day.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dave Birch was at DEMOS&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;In the question time, I asked her if all claimants would have to do this. As Jacqui didn’t answer, I was able to ask Meg, and she told me that not only will benefit claimants not be asked for fingerprints and photos, they won’t be asked for ID cards either, so I don’t think the scheme will have any effect on benefit fraud: either Jacqui was briefed incorrectly on this or I must have misunderstood Meg.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2006/ukpga_20060015_en_2#pb5-l1g16" rel="nofollow"&gt;And if I understand correctly&lt;/a&gt; it would be unlawful without further legislation to require a person to provide  fingerprints, photos, or ID cards as a condition of receiving benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Jacqui Smith didn&#8217;t say that benefit claimants will be asked to verify their identity against the Register - <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7281368.stm" rel="nofollow">she implied it, she didn&#8217;t say it</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Would Jean Hutchinson have been able to commit her crimes if she had been asked to give a photo and fingerprint as proof of her identity when she registered each new benefit claim? The answer is no.</p>
<p>A simple check against the National Identity Register would have revealed the real person&#8217;s face and fingerprints.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://digitaldebateblogs.typepad.com/digital_identity/2008/03/id-day.html" rel="nofollow">Dave Birch was at DEMOS</a>:<br />
<blockquote>In the question time, I asked her if all claimants would have to do this. As Jacqui didn’t answer, I was able to ask Meg, and she told me that not only will benefit claimants not be asked for fingerprints and photos, they won’t be asked for ID cards either, so I don’t think the scheme will have any effect on benefit fraud: either Jacqui was briefed incorrectly on this or I must have misunderstood Meg.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2006/ukpga_20060015_en_2#pb5-l1g16" rel="nofollow">And if I understand correctly</a> it would be unlawful without further legislation to require a person to provide  fingerprints, photos, or ID cards as a condition of receiving benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cost of ID cards by Cayce Pollard</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/cost-of-id-cards/#comment-9785</link>
		<dc:creator>Cayce Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=641#comment-9785</guid>
		<description>Hillier was badly briefed: benefit claimants cannot be asked for ID cards.  But they will be asked to verify their identity against the register, as the Home Security said in her DEMOS speech. It's important to remember that -- whether you agree with ID cards or are against them -- the management consultants have created cards that are security theatre, not security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillier was badly briefed: benefit claimants cannot be asked for ID cards.  But they will be asked to verify their identity against the register, as the Home Security said in her DEMOS speech. It&#8217;s important to remember that &#8212; whether you agree with ID cards or are against them &#8212; the management consultants have created cards that are security theatre, not security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the growth of civil orders to prevent crime and the Serious Crime Bill by Violent Offender Order debate &#171; UK Liberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/on-the-growth-of-civil-orders-to-prevent-crime-and-the-serious-crime-bill/#comment-9759</link>
		<dc:creator>Violent Offender Order debate &#171; UK Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2007/02/14/on-the-growth-of-civil-orders-to-prevent-crime-and-the-serious-crime-bill/#comment-9759</guid>
		<description>[...] Offender Order&#160;debate April 24, 2008   Last covered here in January - my article on the growth of using civil orders to prevent crime may also of interest - they were debated in the Lords last night as part of the Criminal Justice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Offender Order&nbsp;debate April 24, 2008   Last covered here in January - my article on the growth of using civil orders to prevent crime may also of interest - they were debated in the Lords last night as part of the Criminal Justice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Voo-doo by Violent Offender Order debate &#171; UK Liberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/voo-doo/#comment-9758</link>
		<dc:creator>Violent Offender Order debate &#171; UK Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2007/01/15/voo-doo/#comment-9758</guid>
		<description>[...] Offender Order&#160;debate April 24, 2008   Last covered here in January - my article on the growth of using civil orders to prevent crime may also of interest - they were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Offender Order&nbsp;debate April 24, 2008   Last covered here in January - my article on the growth of using civil orders to prevent crime may also of interest - they were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cost of ID cards by ukliberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/cost-of-id-cards/#comment-9757</link>
		<dc:creator>ukliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=641#comment-9757</guid>
		<description>I should make it clear when I accept things for the sake of argument.  In this case I accept for the sake of argument that identity fraud relating to benefit fraud costs £20-50m a year (I have questioned the figure itself before).

So then, where is the business case (justification for change)?  Where is the cost-benefit analysis?  In other words, how much will it cost to save £50m?

As Guy points out, what will be the cost of the infrastructure and training?  As I have said before, it’s worth noting that the cost of the NHS programme went from £2.3 bn, to £5 bn, £6.2 bn, £12.4 bn, and £20 bn - the last not for the central services themselves, Lord Warner has explained, but for enabling everyone to use them!  

Of course, this wasn't in the initial estimate... it's like getting a plumber round, and he installs a new heating system, but there are no thermostats.

"Oh sorry," he says, "I only quoted for the pipes and labour, the thermostats are extra."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should make it clear when I accept things for the sake of argument.  In this case I accept for the sake of argument that identity fraud relating to benefit fraud costs £20-50m a year (I have questioned the figure itself before).</p>
<p>So then, where is the business case (justification for change)?  Where is the cost-benefit analysis?  In other words, how much will it cost to save £50m?</p>
<p>As Guy points out, what will be the cost of the infrastructure and training?  As I have said before, it’s worth noting that the cost of the NHS programme went from £2.3 bn, to £5 bn, £6.2 bn, £12.4 bn, and £20 bn - the last not for the central services themselves, Lord Warner has explained, but for enabling everyone to use them!  </p>
<p>Of course, this wasn&#8217;t in the initial estimate&#8230; it&#8217;s like getting a plumber round, and he installs a new heating system, but there are no thermostats.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh sorry,&#8221; he says, &#8220;I only quoted for the pipes and labour, the thermostats are extra.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cost of ID cards by ukliberty</title>
		<link>http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/cost-of-id-cards/#comment-9756</link>
		<dc:creator>ukliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/?p=641#comment-9756</guid>
		<description>"You do know where the estimated £50 million a year in identity-related benefit fraud comes from, don’t you?"

Yes - and there is supposed to be a new version of the '&lt;a href="http://www.identity-theft.org.uk/ID%20fraud%20table.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;study&lt;/a&gt;' out soon, based on &lt;a href="http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/latest-estimate-of-annual-costs-resulting-from-crimes-associated-with-identity-fraud/" rel="nofollow"&gt;new 'methodology'&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-04-21a.1038.6" rel="nofollow"&gt;They are still working on it!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You do know where the estimated £50 million a year in identity-related benefit fraud comes from, don’t you?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes - and there is supposed to be a new version of the &#8216;<a href="http://www.identity-theft.org.uk/ID%20fraud%20table.pdf" rel="nofollow">study</a>&#8216; out soon, based on <a href="http://ukliberty.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/latest-estimate-of-annual-costs-resulting-from-crimes-associated-with-identity-fraud/" rel="nofollow">new &#8216;methodology&#8217;</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2008-04-21a.1038.6" rel="nofollow">They are still working on it!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
